| |
|
The 800 page Complete Coding Resource Manual is the front desks personal
security blanket.
Obviously, with 800+ pages there is a wealth of
information. This is the compiled wisdom of Dr Webb's years of
experience with coding. In fact, it started out as his own office
manual. It is now the foundation of your coding resources. Here's
a list of some of the major areas:
How to communicate with the patient. Which would YOU
buy most readily - a prophylactic (condom) or did you say prophylaxis? -
or clean breath and sparkling teeth? See, it matters.
How the ADA describes it.
What will Delta Dental do with it? If it's denied you
can charge the patient and if its disallowed, you can't. Do you know
which codes are denied versus disallowed?
Coding advice, short-cuts, alternatives, warnings,
suggestions.
If a chart or form is very often involved, it likely
is the next page in the book, behind the code number that it references.
Can this code be billed to medical? ...and a lot
more...
|
|
|
Are You
Underreporting and Undercharging Your Most Critical Procedures?
That’s too bad; they’re
paid by insurance at 100% of UCR.
Most dentists have a preoccupation with the
technical aspects of their professional day and an aversion to the
daily management of the business. That’s easily explained; you are
highly trained in clinical matters, and probably very much less
trained in dental insurance and financial matters. So you delegate
the front desk problems. Stephen Covey taught us that delegating
without training is really just dumping. Statistics from the dental
insurance industry show that you are losing tons of money by
ignoring the issue. Evaluations, you may still be using the term
“exams”, serve as a perfect example. They are paid at 100% and
statistically you are still undercharging for those
services. Worse, many doctors don’t even charge, at all, for many
of the evaluations they perform.
Quick Quiz
Write directly on this page the average number
of times per day that you use each of these codes: D0110, D0120,
D0130, D0140, D0150, D0160, D0170, and D0180. How did you do?
D0110 – what was called an initial exam, is no
longer a valid code and isn’t payable at all.
D0120 - is so old that it’s still called a
periodic “exam” while the others are now “evaluations.”
D0130 – is a trick question. It doesn’t exist
in the current nomenclature.
D0140 – Limit Oral Evaluation – Problem
Focused, could be used very often per day.
D0150 – Comprehensive Oral Evaluation –
New/Established Patient, very usable.
D0160 – Detailed and Extensive Evaluation –
Problem Focused by Report
D0170 – Re-Evaluation – Limited Problem
Focused, should be used several times a day in hygiene.
D0180 – Comprehensive Periodontal Evaluation –
New/Established Patient, the most underused code of all, perhaps.
I’ll show you, later, why this might be the most important code on
the list.
How many of these codes are actually new to
you, that is, you didn’t even know that they existed? My training
experience tells me that the answer is that more than one of them is
completely unknown to you.
Now go back and repeat the process, this time
recording your average fee for each of the codes. Remember,
insurance pays 100% of the UCR on these codes. By now the problem
should be clear.
So, let’s solve the problem. Actually, there
are at least two problems aren’t there? Which code to use when and
what fee is appropriate for each individual situation?
Before the discomfort gets to extreme for you,
and you decide to delegate this article to the front desk people,
let me add that the proper diagnosis is based on your evaluations.
And, that the proper diagnosis is becoming a matter of litigation on
a daily basis. And, that many dentists are losing their license
because of a missed or non-diagnosed problem. And, many dentists are
sued because of the liability associated with the non-diagnosis of
dental diseases today. A current example: systemic problems,
including diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, are directly
impacted by concurrent periodontal diseases and their treatment. If
the patient is diabetic and you fail to recognize that in
conjunction with their hygiene/perio therapy, that could be grounds
for serious litigation. Likewise, if one of your patients should
experience a CV accident the same week you treat them in
hygiene/perio; your records will likely be reviewed. Therefore, an
evaluation, leading to a proper diagnosis, is perhaps the single
most critical procedure that you perform daily - on a medical, legal
and financial basis. Insurance industry statistics show that many
of you don’t even charge as much as the insurance policy is willing
to pay. You can’t delegate this one.
So, welcome back. Let’s begin with the
nomenclature: What is an evaluation? How is it different from an
exam? Are we following the medical model? Why? Why don’t we have
enough codes to describe the situation? Does the nomenclature imply
a specific diagnosis? What diagnostic codes do I use in dentistry?
Are diagnostic codes required for documentation? When do we get to
the money part? No worries, mate, I’ll make this as painless as
possible.
A Peek at Medical Evaluation Coding
Coding a medical insurance claim involves
several steps. The codes for place of service range from 01 to 99.
There are six physical status modifiers, P1 through P6. This
describes how sick the patient is. There are books on how to code
Evaluation and Management, or what we called “exams”. E&M code
numbers range from 99201 through 99499. Important to this
discussion: there are separate and distinct codes for new patients,
patients of record, patients seen on an emergency basis only and
patients seen for consultation only. Hint: the fees are different
for each of these conditions or combinations of conditions. In
dentistry we have a half-a-dozen codes, for which most dentists
incorrectly think they have to have the same fee, and for which a
majority of dentists are actually charging less than the insurance
policy would pay. This introduces the concept taught to me and many
others by Dr. L.D. Pankey: if the procedure is different, with
different levels of care, skill and judgment, then the fee should be
different. If dentistry had more codes, dentists would be more
likely to assign more (i.e. different) fees for the evaluation
codes. The lack of a proper number of codes has led dentists to
significantly undercharge for the few codes dentistry does have.
You must seriously consider changing this in your office. It is fair
to charge different patients different fees for the same code, since
the care, skill and judgment involved is different. It is also
legal, moral and ethical.
An evaluation is composed of:
- History
- Examination
- Medical decision making – (sinus problem
or endo problem)
- Counseling
- Coordination of care
- Nature of presenting problem; and
- Time
With that many variables involved, it seems
obvious that the fee will vary, and that the fee will not be
insignificant. The amount of time required for each step usually is
very different for a new patient as compared to a patient of record.
Dentistry needs two separate codes at each level, like medicine.
Until then, you might want to consider the difference in time and
expertise involved.
Standard of Care and Focus
Sticking to evaluations and not even thinking
about actual therapy, it is critical for practicing dentists to
recognize that the standard of care for the GP is the same as the
specialist. In court and before the state board of dentistry, you
are legally responsible to diagnose any and all existing disease. It
is malpractice to miss or ignore the cancer in the mouth, the
periodontal disease around the first and second molars, the apical
lesion, etc. If you see a patient for an endodontic emergency only
and miss the oral cancer, are you still liable? Of course you are.
So, the idea of focus becomes important, doesn’t it? Problem Focused
could be a problem. If your focus is limited strictly to the chief
complaint, and you ignore another significant problem without making
at least a notation in your records, you might be the focus of the
next problem.
In light of all this, let’s look a couple of
the evaluation codes and limit our scope to hygiene/perio
situations, they being the single most common.
Code D0140 – Limit Oral Evaluation –
Problem Focused
|
History
|
Usually this is a brief history, as in
an update to the previous history or a short history of the
current emergency |
|
Examination
|
This examination is certainly problem
focused. However, not to the exclusion of items demanded by
the standard of care |
|
Medical decision making
|
Again, usually focused, or a different
code should be employed |
|
Counseling
|
This is often overlooked in hygiene.
D1330 is an important CYA code that is seldom used. This
code can be used for a recall exam |
|
Nature of presenting problem |
If I ask an audience “WHY” they
“recall” patients – the idea that they are monitoring
periodontal disease is foreign to most audiences. |
|
Time
|
The time here is less than a
comprehensive exam, but not unimportant |
The “takeaway” here is that D0140 is very
descriptive of a “recall exam”. Since it is a newer code, the UCR
tends to be higher than the D0120. You have just been reminded that
your fees are too low, below UCR even, and that your liability is
high. Seems like the perfect time to start using the D0140 code with
a higher (variable?) fee.
Code D0170 Re-Evaluation – Limited
Problem Focused
|
History
|
Usually this is a brief history, as in
an update to the previous history or a short history of the
current emergency |
|
Examination
|
This examination is certainly problem
focused. However, not to the exclusion of items demanded by
the standard of care |
|
Medical decision making
|
This is the best code to use after
root planing, when you bring them in to evaluate their
progress and determine if you need to place local
antibiotics or alter their home care regime. |
|
Counseling
|
This is often overlooked in hygiene.
D1330 is an important CYA code that is seldom used. This
code can be used for a recall exam |
|
Nature of presenting problem |
If I ask an audience “WHY” they
“recall” patients – the idea that they are monitoring
periodontal disease is foreign to most audiences. |
|
Time
|
The time here is less than a
comprehensive exam, but not unimportant |
The D0170 is a RE-evaluation. That’s different
than and evaluation. This is a follow-up exam. You spend your time,
care, skill and judgment evaluating the patients progress following
some therapy. Isn’t it clear that this code needs to be used
frequently?
Code D0180
This code was created, in part, to give the
periodontists an exam/evaluation code. Since we GPs are held to the
same standard of care, and since a complete periodontal exam for all
patients is now mandatory – for medical, legal, ethical and
financial reasons, then this code becomes a very functional code for
the GP dentist as well. Note that this includes new patients. This
could be your “new patient” exam. Does a comprehensive periodontal
evaluation include examination and evaluation of existing
restorations? Of course! How about evaluation of the oral soft
tissue? Of course it does. How about….the point is a complete perio
exam includes everything that a new patient exam would include.
Code D0180 Comprehensive Periodontal
Evaluation – New/Established Patient
|
History
|
Comprehensive, both past history and
current. Systemic and local. |
|
Examination
|
Comprehensive – that says it. |
|
Medical decision making
|
Comprehensive. |
|
Counseling
|
Comprehensive |
|
Nature of presenting problem |
Comprehensive |
|
Time
|
This includes “a lot” of face-to-face
time for the doctor, especially in comparison to many of the
other evaluations |
By now, it should be very obvious that your
“exam” fees need to be reconsidered. Here is a simple test. If you
submitted an exam fee to the insurance carrier, and they paid you
100% of the charged fee, what do you now know about your fee? You
know that your fee is lower than the UCR! That is: lower than your
neighbors are charging and lower than the policy allowance. I am not
advocating that you charge more simply because you can. I am
proclaiming loudly your need to be paid appropriately for your care,
skill, judgment and time. At least charge enough to allow you to
maintain your liability insurance policy.
The lack of appropriate codes, the lack of
understanding of the current codes, the lack of doctor direct
involvement in daily coding, the pressing and the proximate problems
have all combined to cause you to lose a very significant amount of
money. The worst part is that your patients have paid their
insurance premiums, they have paid for the coverage, and then your
office may have undercharged or even not charged for critical
services that were rendered. These are procedures that are paid at
100%, no out of pocket expense to the patient. They’ve paid the
premium and you’ve provided the service and the money is left
sitting at the insurance company, only to become more profit for the
insurance company. So, here’s the call to action. Discuss the
importance of the evaluations that your office does with the entire
staff. Raise your fees immediately to the UCR level, at least.
Consider a variable fee schedule. It is fair to charge different
people different amounts for the same code: because we don’t have
enough differentiating codes! Take action today.
How will Delta Dental handle the new codes? Sounds like
you need the Complete Coding Resource manual. This isn't a book you
read, this is a coding book that saves your bottom when the patient
or insurance company wants more information about a charged code.
The re-wording of each procedure, to make it patient friendly so
they will buy - doctors have paid the price of the book to get that
list. It was a bargain. Together with the other kits, you have a comprehensive yet
easy-to-use set of tools that seamlessly integrate highly profitable
management, communications, and coding techniques.
With the Complete Combo, experienced and novice front office managers can implement these superior techniques easily, quickly and affordably.
The most experienced will enjoy the added power and flexibility found in one place. Skills typically learned only in multiple seminars over multiple years, at a cost of thousands of dollars and many lost office hours, will be learned quickly with this system. |
|